Greenhushing must not impact sustainable action

greenhushing

With the rise in greenhushing organisations are being warned not to lose focus on their sustainability goals.

Though greenhushing may seem like it helps companies avoid scrutiny, it could have a detrimental impact on our collective progress towards a more sustainable future.

Greenhushing is the term given to organisations that are hesitant to share progress on sustainability goals to avoid external scrutiny. It is expected to rise up the agenda for some organisations, as scrutiny increases on sustainability statements.

For example, it was recently reported that the EU plans to crack down on inflated claims around products’ environmental credentials through the introduction of ‘proportionate’ penalties. With accusations of greenwashing being likely to increase as punishments are formalised, LRQA is encouraging organisations to relieve any concerns about sharing updates by adopting independent verification to inform progress against sustainability goals.

“While greenhushing may seem like a viable option to avoid any potential external scrutiny, it could have a detrimental impact on our collective progress towards a more sustainable future,” said Heather Moore, technical director for sustainability at LRQA. “Organisations have a big role to play in achieving global sustainability targets. As such, they need to feel confident when speaking about progress, so they can share their wins and losses and learn from each other. Third party verification is one way to regain confidence when communicating progress, as it helps to prove the improvements being made.”

According to LRQA, the role of independent verification and certification frameworks will be key to demonstrate more transparent and accurate sustainability commitments, in turn reducing the risk of being criticised for a lack of progress or misrepresenting data. ISO 14064, for instance, is a standard for greenhouse gas accounting and verification for organisations looking to quantify and reduce emissions, helping companies hit projected greenhouse gas reduction targets.

Together with verification from independent third parties, following such standards can help ease the pressure facing organisations and avoid the need to adopt greenhushing processes, as Heather Moore explains: “Greenhushing may be on the agenda for some organisations this year, but it could have a detrimental impact on long-term global sustainability targets. The best way to safeguard sustainability objectives is through independent third-party verification, as it ensures that companies can accurately keep on track to meet their goals. That way, organisations can be safe in the knowledge they are on the best path to success, creating greater transparency and trust with key stakeholders throughout.”

Related Posts
Others have also viewed
investment

Scale up of investment in SE Asia is vital to meet climate targets

Rapid scale-up of investment in the ASEAN region across all green solutions and technologies is ...
greenwashing

How to avoid being accused of greenwashing

Companies throughout the EU will soon have to justify claims about their products being ‘eco-friendly,’ ...
e-waste

How circularity can reduce e-waste

Research shows a third of consumers don’t know what e-waste means, and 18 per cent are unaware ...
FLAG

FLAG scope 3 rules and implications for farming and food sectors

The new SBTi FLAG scope three guidance is set to have a major impact on companies involved ...