Greenhushing must not impact sustainable action

greenhushing

With the rise in greenhushing organisations are being warned not to lose focus on their sustainability goals.

Though greenhushing may seem like it helps companies avoid scrutiny, it could have a detrimental impact on our collective progress towards a more sustainable future.

Greenhushing is the term given to organisations that are hesitant to share progress on sustainability goals to avoid external scrutiny. It is expected to rise up the agenda for some organisations, as scrutiny increases on sustainability statements.

For example, it was recently reported that the EU plans to crack down on inflated claims around products’ environmental credentials through the introduction of ‘proportionate’ penalties. With accusations of greenwashing being likely to increase as punishments are formalised, LRQA is encouraging organisations to relieve any concerns about sharing updates by adopting independent verification to inform progress against sustainability goals.

“While greenhushing may seem like a viable option to avoid any potential external scrutiny, it could have a detrimental impact on our collective progress towards a more sustainable future,” said Heather Moore, technical director for sustainability at LRQA. “Organisations have a big role to play in achieving global sustainability targets. As such, they need to feel confident when speaking about progress, so they can share their wins and losses and learn from each other. Third party verification is one way to regain confidence when communicating progress, as it helps to prove the improvements being made.”

According to LRQA, the role of independent verification and certification frameworks will be key to demonstrate more transparent and accurate sustainability commitments, in turn reducing the risk of being criticised for a lack of progress or misrepresenting data. ISO 14064, for instance, is a standard for greenhouse gas accounting and verification for organisations looking to quantify and reduce emissions, helping companies hit projected greenhouse gas reduction targets.

Together with verification from independent third parties, following such standards can help ease the pressure facing organisations and avoid the need to adopt greenhushing processes, as Heather Moore explains: “Greenhushing may be on the agenda for some organisations this year, but it could have a detrimental impact on long-term global sustainability targets. The best way to safeguard sustainability objectives is through independent third-party verification, as it ensures that companies can accurately keep on track to meet their goals. That way, organisations can be safe in the knowledge they are on the best path to success, creating greater transparency and trust with key stakeholders throughout.”

Related Posts
Others have also viewed

Meet the trailblazing women collaborating to save the ocean and increase gender diversity in STEM

In Mauritius, Scotland, Manchester, London, and Australia a group of award-winning women scientists and experts ...

STUDY: UK transport and logistics industry faces sustainability gap admist AI adoption

HERE Technologies, the leading location data and technology platform, today unveiled insights from its latest ...

Einride, Mars partner for Europe’s biggest road freight electrification in FMCG industry

Einride, a freight mobility company that provides digital, electric and autonomous technology, has partnered with ...

BCG and Climeworks sign historic 15-Year carbon removal agreement

Climeworks, a global leader in carbon removal via direct air capture technology, and Boston Consulting ...